The ideal state for on-chain identity is for users to seamlessly transfer their identities across different chains and applications. However, in practice, the diversity of DID methods, resolution mechanisms, and credential formats has become the main obstacle to interoperability.
Currently, each ecosystem implements DID solutions independently, making it difficult to reuse identities across platforms. This not only increases development complexity but also undermines the overall value of “self-sovereign identity.” From both technical and ecosystem perspectives, the main challenges include:
Addressing these issues requires further convergence on technical standards, as well as collaboration among ecosystem participants at the implementation level.
The core concept of on-chain identity is user sovereignty, but this inevitably clashes with regulatory demands in the real world. Regulators in different countries want to ensure compliance, anti-money laundering measures, and accountability, while users want to maximize privacy and control over their data.
This tension is not black-and-white; it requires finding balance points in various scenarios. For example:
Therefore, the future of on-chain identity is not just a technical challenge—it is also a matter of institutional design and societal consensus.
Looking ahead, on-chain identity will likely evolve from a standalone component into an embedded infrastructure layer deeply integrated with wallets, protocols, and operating systems. Identity verification and authorization will become increasingly invisible, occurring without user awareness.
Key features of the next phase may include:
When identity shifts from simply “who you are” to “what you can do” and “how much you are trusted,” on-chain identity will truly become the foundation of Web3’s trust architecture.