Looking at the on-chain data trends, it appears that the long-term holders of BTC are mostly maintaining stable positions, while the frequent movements are primarily driven by short-term speculative funds. Under this pattern, the market's actual panic sentiment isn't as intense as it might seem on the surface.
Regarding the recent tariff discussions, I tend to believe this is just short-term market noise. Trump's actions can be better understood as leverage at the negotiation table rather than an actual intention to start a trade war. The market's reaction has indeed been somewhat overinterpreted.
From a technical perspective, BTC is heavily accumulated in the price range of $83,000 to $92,000. This has formed a solid support zone that is unlikely to be broken in the short term. Large position holders are probably waiting for higher levels before considering profit-taking.
Viewing from another angle, such a distribution of chips is actually quite healthy. There is no sign of a large-scale sell-off or institutional fund withdrawal. The issue may simply be that it takes enough time to digest these profit-taking positions.
Ultimately, the current Bitcoin ecosystem is no longer dominated by retail investors. With such a high proportion of institutional funds, their decision-making pace is definitely much slower than that of ordinary investors.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ContractSurrender
· 6h ago
It's the same old chip analysis approach, which is correct, but it sounds like we're just waiting for the big institutions to decide our fate.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingersFrontrun
· 7h ago
On-chain data doesn't lie; stable chips indicate this round isn't that bad
Trump's approach is just market manipulation talk; the market is too naive
This fortress between 83-92k can't be broken by anyone; institutions are just slow to heat up
View OriginalReply0
rugpull_survivor
· 7h ago
Ha, it's chip analysis again. Basically, big players are still accumulating, while retail investors are screaming.
As for the tariffs, I just take it as a joke. If a trade war really breaks out, the crypto prices would have already collapsed.
Is the move from 83k to 92k so intense? Wait, didn't I say the same thing last time... and what was the result?
Institutions are taking their time, while retail investors are getting anxious. This is the current story.
To be honest, I haven't seen any particularly exciting signals, so we're just waiting.
Looking at the on-chain data trends, it appears that the long-term holders of BTC are mostly maintaining stable positions, while the frequent movements are primarily driven by short-term speculative funds. Under this pattern, the market's actual panic sentiment isn't as intense as it might seem on the surface.
Regarding the recent tariff discussions, I tend to believe this is just short-term market noise. Trump's actions can be better understood as leverage at the negotiation table rather than an actual intention to start a trade war. The market's reaction has indeed been somewhat overinterpreted.
From a technical perspective, BTC is heavily accumulated in the price range of $83,000 to $92,000. This has formed a solid support zone that is unlikely to be broken in the short term. Large position holders are probably waiting for higher levels before considering profit-taking.
Viewing from another angle, such a distribution of chips is actually quite healthy. There is no sign of a large-scale sell-off or institutional fund withdrawal. The issue may simply be that it takes enough time to digest these profit-taking positions.
Ultimately, the current Bitcoin ecosystem is no longer dominated by retail investors. With such a high proportion of institutional funds, their decision-making pace is definitely much slower than that of ordinary investors.