Looking at the recent mainstream BTC ETFs can help understand what institutions are doing. BlackRock's IBIT, Fidelity's FBTC, and Grayscale's GBTC, these heavyweight players' movements often reflect the true attitude of large funds.



Based on data after January 30th, there has been a clear adjustment in buying and selling by institutions—simply put, some are increasing their positions while others are reducing theirs. This kind of yin and yang situation is quite common in the crypto market and should not be a reason for panic.

Rather than guessing the short-term operations of institutions, it's better to look at the overall trend. Breaking through the $100,000 psychological barrier for BTC is not a distant dream from both fundamental and capital flow perspectives. Since institutions are still frequently adjusting their positions in this space, it only shows one thing—they believe the story is not over yet.
BTC-0,29%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-cff9c776vip
· 17h ago
Institutions' recent moves, to put it simply, are like performing Schrödinger's bull market... Some are adding positions while others are reducing holdings. It may seem contradictory, but in reality, they are just leaving room for imagination. According to the supply and demand curve, as long as there are still people frequently adjusting their positions, it indicates that this narrative is far from being exhausted.
View OriginalReply0
BearWhisperGodvip
· 17h ago
Institutional accumulation and reduction—who can't see through this dance? The key is to watch whether they are experiencing net inflow or net outflow. Don't be fooled by appearances. Is $100,000 really that close? I feel like it still needs some adjustment. To be honest, this round of institutional actions are indeed cautious; there's no longer the previous enthusiasm for aggressive accumulation. Wait, Grayscale is still bleeding; isn't that a sign that the story isn't over yet? If they are withdrawing, it just means they are not optimistic about the future. Stop making up reasons, brother.
View OriginalReply0
StableGeniusDegenvip
· 17h ago
What does it mean when institutions frequently adjust their positions? Aren't they all optimistic about the future market? They've long been planning the story of $100,000, and it’s not over yet.
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinConnoisseurvip
· 17h ago
The grayscale wave of reduction really can't hold anymore haha, but on the other hand, IBIT and FBTC are still having meals, indicating that the big players haven't run yet. Frequent portfolio adjustments by institutions are the best signal; stagnant water is actually the danger. Ten thousand dollars is not that far away, it will definitely happen before the end of the year.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBardvip
· 17h ago
Institutional rebalancing is very normal. BlackRock and Grayscale are adding and reducing respectively, which shows the market is still alive.
View OriginalReply0
ContractTestervip
· 17h ago
BlackRock's move is really teaching a lesson to later entrants; institutions thrive on this kind of well-paced rhythm.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)