Back in 1977, Congress brought back the general emergency authority through the International Emergency Economic Powers Act—a peacetime version of the original emergency framework. Here's the thing though: nobody really anticipated it would hand over blanket tariff powers. The law itself never mentions tariffs. As economist Alan Wolff points out, the statute's language doesn't provide that kind of sweeping trade authority at all.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleInTraining
· 17h ago
So Congress just messed up the power like that? This bill is really well written, haha.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressMiner
· 17h ago
It looks like the classic scam again — legal clauses written on paper and actual enforcement power are completely two different things. The lawmakers in 1977 never imagined that what they signed would be played with like this. Now it has become some people's "master key," and this is the contract loophole in the off-chain world.
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperer
· 17h ago
Bro, this is outrageous. The 1977 Act is being used as a shield, but it doesn't even mention tariffs at all.
View OriginalReply0
ShibaMillionairen't
· 17h ago
So the tricks Congress played back then are now being used as a "legal shield"? That's really clever.
View OriginalReply0
DegenRecoveryGroup
· 18h ago
Oh my god, this bill is really outrageous. Who would have thought it would be played out like this?
View OriginalReply0
SignatureLiquidator
· 18h ago
The 77 Act was really brilliant, written ambiguously, and ended up being turned into a major tariff weapon.
Back in 1977, Congress brought back the general emergency authority through the International Emergency Economic Powers Act—a peacetime version of the original emergency framework. Here's the thing though: nobody really anticipated it would hand over blanket tariff powers. The law itself never mentions tariffs. As economist Alan Wolff points out, the statute's language doesn't provide that kind of sweeping trade authority at all.