Uniswap founder interprets prediction market pricing discrepancies: not due to user structure issues, but caused by differences in event definitions and rules
Odaily Planet Daily reports that Uniswap founder Hayden Adams posted on X platform that the prediction market Kalshi prices the “U.S. acquisition of Greenland” at about 42%, while Polymarket prices it at only 15%–23%. Such a significant price discrepancy is not due to differences in user groups, but more related to the specific betting targets themselves. If it were just a matter of different user structures, a trader with access to both major platforms could quickly arbitrage away the price difference. However, the actual situation may be: Polymarket’s “probability of happening within 2026 (currently about 23%)” and Kalshi’s “probability of happening during Trump’s entire term (currently about 45%)” are not the same event. Additionally, differences in question phrasing, settlement conditions, oracle design, and risk pricing logic can all lead to different pricing.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Uniswap founder interprets prediction market pricing discrepancies: not due to user structure issues, but caused by differences in event definitions and rules
Odaily Planet Daily reports that Uniswap founder Hayden Adams posted on X platform that the prediction market Kalshi prices the “U.S. acquisition of Greenland” at about 42%, while Polymarket prices it at only 15%–23%. Such a significant price discrepancy is not due to differences in user groups, but more related to the specific betting targets themselves. If it were just a matter of different user structures, a trader with access to both major platforms could quickly arbitrage away the price difference. However, the actual situation may be: Polymarket’s “probability of happening within 2026 (currently about 23%)” and Kalshi’s “probability of happening during Trump’s entire term (currently about 45%)” are not the same event. Additionally, differences in question phrasing, settlement conditions, oracle design, and risk pricing logic can all lead to different pricing.