2026-01-23 07:38:58

Currently, AI training faces a core dilemma: data sources are filled with low-quality content—大量复制粘贴的观点、掺杂其中的垃圾信息，这些「廉价数据」会逐步放大整个训练过程中的噪音。

Against this backdrop, a project in the virtual ecosystem has a noteworthy approach: they are attempting to create an AI training data network based on a privacy enforcement mechanism. This direction is quite interesting—by using privacy protection layers to filter and optimize data quality, it may help improve the current data challenges in AI training.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SatoshiSherpa

· 3h ago

AI trained on garbage data is just so-so. It's a bit late to realize the problem now. Privacy mechanisms + data filtering, this idea is actually not bad, but whether it can truly prevent capital's greed in implementation remains to be seen. These two issues are essentially contradictory, right? Wanting privacy protection and large-scale training at the same time... To put it nicely, it's optimization; to be blunt, it's just throwing money to rerun the process. Can Bitcoin's approach solve this? I'm a bit skeptical. But it's still better than the current chaos; at least someone is trying.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeWhisperer

· 3h ago

Trash in, trash out. This matter should have been addressed long ago. --- Privacy layer filters data? Sounds like panning for gold in a trash heap, but it's worth a look. --- Another solution for data noise, feels like someone promotes this concept every month. --- The real issue isn't privacy; it's that no one wants to pay for high-quality data. --- So it's like encrypted data cleaning? Alright, I'll wait to see the white paper. --- Whether this idea works or not depends on whether it can attract quality creators; otherwise, it's just a bunch of copy-paste. --- Web3 doing data governance sounds good, but I'm afraid it will just become another hype topic.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityOracle

· 3h ago

Data garbage dumps are really getting more and more intense, no wonder AI outputs are also becoming more and more laggy... The idea of using privacy layers to filter data really needs to be pondered. --- Both privacy and data quality sound great, but I'm just worried that in the end it's just putting old wine in new bottles. --- There's a lot of nonsense, but the key is whether this mechanism can truly filter out those copied and pasted garbage—that's the real point. --- Huh? Using privacy protection to optimize data? That might actually increase costs. How much can it really save to be worth it? --- This direction is interesting, but it seems many projects claim they can solve data problems. But what’s the reality? --- Feeding garbage data to AI, and AI just becomes garbage... Is this our fate? --- Wait, why does it feel like privacy protection and data optimization are a bit at odds? --- I've known for a long time that data is a bottleneck; now it's just a matter of who can truly solve this pain point.

View OriginalReply0

Degen4Breakfast

· 3h ago

Well, it's about exposing garbage data feeding AI... It should have been regulated long ago. Now, everywhere is just copy-pasted crap. Privacy layers to filter? That’s a good idea, but it depends on whether they can really block out those low-quality stuff. Honestly, it’s still poor data quality; no matter how smart the model is, it can’t save that. Curious about how this project operates specifically. If they can truly improve data quality, then there’s potential. AI training is just a vicious cycle: garbage in, garbage out. Someone needs to step up and change this situation. Can this mechanism work? It sounds easy to implement but difficult to actually achieve... Exactly, today’s AI is fed with too much junk. Privacy mechanisms as a filter? That’s interesting.

View OriginalReply0