Many people view Dusk with a retail investor's perspective, thinking it's not popular, not eye-catching, and has only moderate gains. But fundamentally, this is a misjudgment of the direction.

From the moment Dusk was born, it was never a project designed to cater to retail sentiment. Its goal is not to become a "hot topic," but to serve as infrastructure for compliant financial scenarios.

Think about why traditional finance has been able to operate stably for so many years. The answer is simple — it has never cared about how "hot" it is, but rather: can it pass compliance reviews? Can it be fully audited? Can accountability be traced? Can it exist stably over the long term?

Dusk’s privacy design logic is also based on this principle. Some think it aims to evade regulation, but it’s actually the opposite. Its privacy is intended to minimize information disclosure while remaining fully compliant. This is very different from projects that want to completely hide identities and avoid regulation. One wants to escape the system, the other wants to integrate into it. The difference is huge.

So you will find that Dusk’s community is particularly calm — they don’t argue, they’re not restless, and they don’t chase trends. This is not a sign of a project lacking popularity; rather, it indicates that its target users are entirely different: not retail investors, but genuine institutions, compliance teams, and responsible users.

Such projects may seem dull in the bullish emotional market, but once the institutional framework begins to shift, the pricing logic will be completely rewritten.