Looking at the data, speaking about reality. $CHZ's performance around the World Cup is arguably the most textbook example of an "event-driven" phenomenon in the crypto market. Let's thoroughly review these two cycles.
**2018 Russia World Cup — The Underdog's Crazy Surge**
Four months before the event (mid-February), nobody paid attention to CHZ. The price stayed at a low of $0.008, with a market cap of only $32 million, and daily trading volume around $2 million. The ecosystem was even more barren, with few partner clubs and virtually no ecological support.
But as the final approached, the sentiment changed completely. In mid-July, the price hit a high of $0.036, a 350% increase over four months. The market cap expanded to $180 million, and daily trading volume increased fourfold. It looked glorious.
But reality? As soon as the event ended, the hype vanished instantly. Within three months, the price plummeted 85%. That’s it. Purely an emotional game — quick to rise, quick to fall.
**2022 Qatar World Cup — Ecosystem Improved, but Still Not Enough**
By 2022, CHZ was no longer an unknown project. Four months before the event (mid-July), the price was already at $0.10, with a market cap of $400 million — 12.5 times the same period four years earlier. This time, trading volume soared to $120 million, with over 40 partner clubs, and the Socios platform gained 270,000 new users. The ecosystem was taking shape.
So, could it be different this time? At the peak of sentiment in November, the price reached $0.266, a 166% increase. The numbers look good, but the question is — **the growth was only half of 2018’s**. Why? Because the market size is bigger, and it’s harder to move. Liquidity and participant structure have changed.
What’s even more severe is what happened afterward. The FTX collapse and the event’s impact hit together, with a 65% correction within three months. Although there was ecological support, unlike four years ago, the price didn’t crash to zero. But the problem was exposed — the project lacked a sustainable revenue stream and genuine compliant cash flow support. In the end, it still fell into the cycle of "buying the hype, selling the reality."
**Conclusion**
From these two cycles, we see that event-driven hype can indeed ignite the market in the short term. But if you rely solely on hot topics, you will eventually hit a wall. No matter how mature the ecosystem, without sustainable value creation and revenue mechanisms, it’s only delaying the decline and cannot change the overall trend.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CurrencyFuller
· 18h ago
That's too heartbreaking; event-driven is just a new disguise for scamming retail investors.
No matter how strong the ecosystem is, it can't save projects without cash flow. CHZ's two instances are a living textbook of the opposite.
It's better to stick to long-term strategies; chasing hot topics will eventually lead to a wall.
View OriginalReply0
CurrencyFuller
· 18h ago
Damn, that's why I got stuck until now since 2018.
View OriginalReply0
AmateurEntertainment
· 20h ago
2026 Go Go Go 👊
View OriginalReply0
HodlVeteran
· 20h ago
It's the same old story. I got caught up with CHZ back in 2018, and now it still feels like the same old tricks.
This thing relies on hot topics to survive; without real cash flow, no matter how fancy the ecosystem is, it's useless. Whenever I see the words "event-driven," I remember the days I suffered heavy losses.
I should have realized long ago that chasing hot topics is just handing over the bag to the whales.
This time, we should learn our lesson. Don't go all-in, everyone.
Looking at these numbers, after FTX exploded, all the ecosystem support turned into paper talk. I won't believe this anymore.
Right now, there's only one logic: tokens without a sustainable revenue source, no matter how hot, are just illusions.
View OriginalReply0
CrashHotline
· 20h ago
Damn, that's why I got stuck until now since 2018.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichVictim
· 20h ago
It's another event-driven story. Honestly, it's just following the trend and getting cut.
Is the ecosystem really that important? It seems like everyone just wants to make quick money.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 20h ago
Basically, it's about telling stories that can lead to a rise; once the story is over, it has to fall. It's the same principle throughout history and across the world.
View OriginalReply0
metaverse_hermit
· 20h ago
Haha, it's the same old trick again. Event-driven strategies are just to cut the leeks.
A mature ecosystem can't save you; you still need real money to succeed.
That 350% surge in 2018 now seems crazy, and then it plummeted 85% right after.
Once the World Cup hype passes, no one cares anymore. That's the magic of crypto, right?
The FTX explosion led to total loss; projects with unstable foundations are ultimately just paper tigers.
Sustainable cash flow is the key; relying solely on sentiment will eventually lead to problems.
The bigger the market cap, the harder it is to move. That's why it only increased by 166% in the later stages.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAnxiety
· 20h ago
That's too heartbreaking; event-driven is just a new disguise for scamming retail investors.
No matter how strong the ecosystem is, it can't save projects without cash flow. CHZ's two instances are a living textbook of the opposite.
It's better to stick to long-term strategies; chasing hot topics will eventually lead to a wall.
Looking at the data, speaking about reality. $CHZ's performance around the World Cup is arguably the most textbook example of an "event-driven" phenomenon in the crypto market. Let's thoroughly review these two cycles.
**2018 Russia World Cup — The Underdog's Crazy Surge**
Four months before the event (mid-February), nobody paid attention to CHZ. The price stayed at a low of $0.008, with a market cap of only $32 million, and daily trading volume around $2 million. The ecosystem was even more barren, with few partner clubs and virtually no ecological support.
But as the final approached, the sentiment changed completely. In mid-July, the price hit a high of $0.036, a 350% increase over four months. The market cap expanded to $180 million, and daily trading volume increased fourfold. It looked glorious.
But reality? As soon as the event ended, the hype vanished instantly. Within three months, the price plummeted 85%. That’s it. Purely an emotional game — quick to rise, quick to fall.
**2022 Qatar World Cup — Ecosystem Improved, but Still Not Enough**
By 2022, CHZ was no longer an unknown project. Four months before the event (mid-July), the price was already at $0.10, with a market cap of $400 million — 12.5 times the same period four years earlier. This time, trading volume soared to $120 million, with over 40 partner clubs, and the Socios platform gained 270,000 new users. The ecosystem was taking shape.
So, could it be different this time? At the peak of sentiment in November, the price reached $0.266, a 166% increase. The numbers look good, but the question is — **the growth was only half of 2018’s**. Why? Because the market size is bigger, and it’s harder to move. Liquidity and participant structure have changed.
What’s even more severe is what happened afterward. The FTX collapse and the event’s impact hit together, with a 65% correction within three months. Although there was ecological support, unlike four years ago, the price didn’t crash to zero. But the problem was exposed — the project lacked a sustainable revenue stream and genuine compliant cash flow support. In the end, it still fell into the cycle of "buying the hype, selling the reality."
**Conclusion**
From these two cycles, we see that event-driven hype can indeed ignite the market in the short term. But if you rely solely on hot topics, you will eventually hit a wall. No matter how mature the ecosystem, without sustainable value creation and revenue mechanisms, it’s only delaying the decline and cannot change the overall trend.