2026-01-22 09:44:33

A question worth pondering: how did crypto projects gradually become different from their original intentions?

At Convergence 2025, Ethereum founder Vitalik pointed out that the loss of this principle is often gradual and hard to notice all at once. He used a rather sobering example — initially, projects added servers for convenience and implemented multi-signature contracts for security, which all sounded very reasonable. But then what happened? To compete with others, they gradually moved towards closed-source development.

This process is like boiling a frog in warm water. Step by step, compromises are made, concessions are given, until eventually, they realize they have strayed from their original purpose. The ideals of open source and decentralization are gradually eroded in the face of利益. This also explains why some projects that once championed open source have ultimately become tools controlled by利益 groups.

ETH-2,91%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Hash_Bandit

· 10h ago

nah this hits different when you've been mining since the difficulty epochs were actually manageable... vitalik's not wrong tho, it's exactly like thermal degradation in hardware—starts small, then suddenly your whole rig's compromised

Reply0

fren.eth

· 10h ago

The boiling frog analogy is perfect. Looking back, many projects indeed follow this path. Once you compromise once, there will be a second time, and then it becomes unstoppable. The moment it goes closed-source, it's actually already cooled off; it's just still pretending.

View OriginalReply0

DuskSurfer

· 10h ago

The boiling frog analogy is spot on; it describes the common problem in this circle right now. Initially full of idealism, and in the end, everyone just compromises.

View OriginalReply0

GigaBrainAnon

· 11h ago

The term "boiling frog in warm water" is used so perfectly; it refers to those projects in the community. They didn't initially intend to do bad things, but once they compromise once, there will be a second time. In the end, who still remembers the pretty words in the white paper?

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 11h ago

The analogy of boiling frogs in warm water is perfect; it describes the current state of this circle. --- Another "We are doing this for safety" opening, and the result... closed source. Hilarious. --- Vitalik always hits the nail on the head, but who is really making changes? --- The first step to compromise is the end of the road; there's no doubt about that. --- Open source ideals vs. capital reality, in the end, it's all about capital winning... --- It's correct, but what's the use? Those who should deviate from their original intentions still do so. --- From "We are decentralized" to "We are centralized," it's just a matter of a few years. --- Isn't this the standard script for every project? They've all played it out.

View OriginalReply0

airdrop_huntress

· 11h ago

I was just saying how some old projects have fallen into corruption now Really, that initial sense of idealism was truly appealing, but then? When profits come into play, everything is compromised The metaphor of boiling a frog in warm water is perfect—who can notice they are gradually changing? Where has the spirit of open source gone? Now it's all closed source fighting for territory Actually, it was clear from the start—there are no eternal beliefs, only eternal interests

View OriginalReply0

StopLossMaster

· 11h ago

Warm water boiling frogs, this metaphor is spot on... Watching some major projects operate is really hard to describe --- It's the same old rhetoric, in the face of利益, ideals are just paper --- So, relying on promises to choose coins is purely asking for trouble --- Vitalik finally spoke sensibly this time, but was it too late... --- That step into closed source already revealed the change in flavor; everything before was just a prelude --- From open source to closed source, from idealism to reality, the Web3 story is always the same --- Ironically, we all know this routine, yet we still get caught in it --- Gradually retreating, ultimately becoming unrecognizable... Is this the fate of crypto projects? --- Instead of overthinking, it's better to cut losses early and stop entangling yourself

View OriginalReply0